Washington think tank pans Harper
government's stem cell research panel
[PoliticsWatch updated 5:15 p.m., January 11, 2007]
|Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
The Conservative government's pre-Christmas appointment of 10
members to a reproductive technology panel is being criticized by a
respected U.S. think tank.
The Washington-based Cato Institute's director of bioethics
studies, Sigfrid Fry-Revere, this week published a commentary
accusing the government of politicizing a scientific
Days before the Christmas break, Health Minister Tony Clement
issued a press release announcing the selection of 10 members to the
board of the recently created Assisted Human Reproduction Agency.
The board members will monitor the agency which oversees
reproductive technologies in Canada, including fertility clinics and
The board includes former Nova Scotia premier John
Hamm, who is a medical doctor, but also includes those who have
spoken out in the past against abortion and certain types of stem
"There is no one on the board with a history of advocating either for those in need of reproductive technologies or embryonic stem cell
research," Fry-Revere wrote this week.
"It is likely, given the composition of the board, that the regulations promised for nineteen months from now will have little to offer those in need of new reproductive technologies or embryonic stem cell therapies."
Fry-Revere concluded that following the government's appointments
that "there isn't much hope on the horizon for new reproductive technologies and embryonic stem cell research in
The Cato Institute describes itself as a non-profit public policy
research foundation that advocates for the "traditional American principles of limited government, individual liberty, free markets and peace."
The government also came under fire in Ottawa on Thursday when two
Liberal MPs and infertility stakeholders held a press conference to
criticize the government for failing to include fertility experts,
patients and stem cell scientists on the board.
There are three remaining board seats that are not filled and the
participants at the press conference called on the government to
fill them with experts and patients.
"We end up with a rabbi and a nun (on the board), we end up with all this sort of religious, ethical stuff swirling around and we have left out the people affected,"
argued Liberal MP Carolyn Bennett. "It's distracting in this particular topic."
Liberal MP Ruby Dhalla accused the government of having
"stacked" the board "with members who actually
overtly oppose stem-cell research and the use of assisted
Four of the members of the board have been publicly criticized in
the media for their views on related topics.
Neither Bennett nor Dhalla, however, would say if they believed the
selection of the board would damage Canada's reputation with the
medical and scientific community abroad.
Clement said in December that the group was selected because of its
"rich diversity of experience and perspectives."
The ethical issues surrounding reproductive technologies and
embryonic stem cell research are a hot political topic in both
Canada and the U.S that often divides social conservatives from
On Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 253-174 to
bolster embryonic stem cell research.
But the White House has vowed to veto the legislation, which failed
to get the two-thirds majority required to override a veto.
The Associated Press quoted the White House as saying the bill
"would use federal taxpayer dollars to support and encourage the destruction of human life for research."
© PoliticsWatch® 2006. All rights reserved. Republication
or redistribution of PoliticsWatch content, including by framing,
copying, linking or similar means, is expressly prohibited without
the prior written consent of Public Interests Research and Communications
Inc. (PIRCINC). PoliticsWatch is registered trademark of PIRCINC.