Martin rejects opposition
[PoliticsWatch Updated 6:30 p.m. November 14, 2005]
OTTAWA — Prime
Minister Paul Martin emerged from a cabinet meeting Monday and again
rejected a proposal by the three opposition parties for him to call
an election in January.
Martin called the opposition demand for an early election
Speaking in the foyer of the House of Commons
before question period with about a dozen senior MPs from all
parties assembled with reporters watching, Martin mocked the
opposition for their proposed motion that would essentially ask the
government to resign but continue to have Parliament operate until
"In our system of Parliament, you don’t get to vote, 'No, but Yes for
now,'" Martin said. " There is no such thing as non-confidence
The opposition parties are united in a plan to put forward a motion
requesting the government call an election in the first week of next
The parties are trying to avoid being blamed for a Christmas
election campaign and for killing two key pieces of legislation --
the supplemental estimates, which contain a number of popular
spending propositions, and the government's plan to send energy
rebate checks to low-income Canadians to deal with higher winter
They argue that if Martin doesn't back their motion then he is to
blame for all these initiatives being killed when they introduce a
non-confidence motion next week.
But Martin is saying the opposition will be
blamed for the Christmas election, not him.
"If the opposition parties act on their threat to bring down the government, there will be a price: much will be lost. And for what?"
he asked. "For eight weeks’ difference. And what do Canadians gain? An election campaign they don’t want, at a time of year that is supposed to be about family, not partisan politics."
The question remains, why do the opposition parties still plan to go
ahead with their motion asking the prime minister to call an
election when he has now publicly rejected it? Why not just defeat
the government on a non-confidence motion this week?
An opposition motion setting an election date is non-binding on the
government. But a non-confidence vote is.
"We would like to have a vote in the House of Commons to
establish whether a majority of the House supports the
compromise," said NDP leader Jack Layton.
"I believe the majority of the House does support the
compromise and that should be established so that if the prime
minister is deciding to turn his back on the majority of the House
then it's a fact and he'll have to explain it to Canadians."
Although there were really no new developments in Ottawa on Monday,
there was an electric atmosphere on Parliament Hill similar to the
days leading up to the confidence showdown in May.
In question period, NDP MP Bill Blaikie lashed out at the prime
minister for rejecting out of hand the opposition plan for a
post-Christmas election call.
"If the prime minister has the right to say when the election should be, Parliament has the right to say when the election should be and we all have the right to say when the election should be, by mutual
consent," Blaikie said.
"Here is somebody who says he is against the democratic deficit. Have him them stand and say why he would reject the will of Parliament and put the interest of his own party first."
In other developments, the Bloc Quebecois ended its three-day long
filibuster in the House of Commons after receiving written assurance
from Government House Leader Tony Valeri that opposition days will
be held on set dates.
In response to a letter from Bloc Quebecois House Leader Michel
Gauthier, Valeri said confirmed that opposition days will be held on
November 15, 17, 22, 24 and 29th. And on December 1 and 8.
The key dates are November 15 -- when the Conservatives plan to use
its opposition day to vote on the election date motion -- and
November 22 when a non-confidence vote will be brought forward if
the government rejects the November 15 motion.
The three opposition parties have a majority of seats in Parliament
and can easily pass the motions.
© PoliticsWatch® 2005. All rights reserved. Republication
or redistribution of PoliticsWatch content, including by framing,
copying, linking or similar means, is expressly prohibited without
the prior written consent of Public Interests Research and Communications
Inc. (PIRCINC). PoliticsWatch is registered trademark of PIRCINC.