Layton: Toronto a "one-party
[PoliticsWatch Updated 5:45 p.m. December 20, 2005]
|NDP Leader Jack Layton surrounded by Toronto
NDP Leader Jack Layton made his best and most humourous attempt yet in the election
to counter Liberal scare tactics.
In the last election and so far in this election, the Liberals have - with good effect -- urged NDP voters to vote Liberal in an effort to prevent Conservative Leader Stephen Harper from becoming prime minister.
Campaigning in Toronto Tuesday, Layton said people in Toronto who are afraid of the Conservatives winning seats don't have to vote Liberal to stop them.
Because the Conservatives can't win any seats in the 22 ridings in the city, according to Layton.
"Friends, in Toronto, you don't have to worry about electing Conservatives," he said. "It's not going to happen. A Conservative in Toronto has about as much chance of getting elected as a jay-walker on the 401.
"The Liberal scare tactic doesn't work in Toronto. It's like being afraid of sharks in Lake Ontario."
Layton pointed out that Conservative candidates on average finished 15,000 votes behind the Liberals in Toronto's 22 ridings in the last election.
Layton is the only NDP or conservative party MP elected in Toronto since the 1993 federal election.
"Toronto is more of a one-party state than Alberta," he said.
He also used accused much of the Toronto Liberal caucus of being do-nothing MPs.
"Liberals of are a Toronto version of a Seinfeld show. A caucus about nothing that does nothing."
The NDP could win three or four more seats in downtown Toronto, including campaigns featuring Layton's wife, Olivia Chow, in Trinity --Spadina, Peggy Nash in Parkdale - High Park, and Marilyn Churley in Beaches - East York.
Attention Campaign lobbyists
Last week, PoliticsWatch wrote about lobbyists
participating in the election campaigns of the Liberals and the
Perhaps it was a coincidence, but on Monday Michael Nelson, the
federal registrar of lobbyists, sent out
a reminder to all lobbyists about their activities during the
federal election campaign.
"Lobbyists should take all necessary measures
to avoid any real or apparent conflict of interest involving themselves and
their clients, as well as with public office holders which they may meet,
help or otherwise communicate with as they participate in political
activities," the e-mail read.
"In particular, lobbyists should ensure that they do not put public office holders in a position where they could themselves be in breach
of their own code of conduct.
"Consequently, lobbyists should establish to which extent their political
activities and their lobbying activities are compatible and determine
whether one or the other needs to be reassessed during the election
campaign. In this context, should lobbyists decide to cease their lobbying
activities and de-register during the campaign, this Office will ensure that
such termination and subsequent registration requests are processed
Last week, Duff Conacher of Democracy Watch told PoliticsWatch that
he believed the lobbyist code of conduct prohibits lobbyists from
working on election campaigns.
"The lobbyist code of conduct says you can't put any public office holder in a conflict of
interest," Conacher said.
Nelson's reminder this week, however, seems to suggest that it is
okay for lobbyists to work on a campaign, as long as they deregister
from lobbying activities for the duration of the campaign.
"It's a bizarre document because he seems to be talking out of
both sides of his mouth," said Conacher after seeing the
"When you decide to help out on the campaign you're still a
lobbyist and you're admitting that working on a campaign is a
conflict of interest by deregistering."
While Nelson issued the reminder to lobbyists, he did not issue an
interpretation bulletin on the registrar's Web site.
Conacher said he planned to show the e-mail to his lawyers because
Nelson's reminder could be viewed as an interpretation of the
lobbyists code of conduct.
Democracy Watch is currently awaiting how the federal government
will deal with eight of its complaints returned to the government
after a federal court judge ruled that former ethics counsellor
Howard Wilson was biased.
Those complaints, which Wilson dismissed, included a complaint
about nine lobbyists that worked on the leadership campaigns of
Liberals Paul Martin, John Manley, Sheila Copps, Allan Rock and the
Canadian Alliance's Grant Hill.
"The lobbyists we complained about did not deregister,"
But Conacher said Nelson's reminder to lobbyists this week appears
to support his group's view that lobbyists should deregister before
working on campaigns.
"He's saying that everything Democracy Watch has been saying since
the code came into effect in 1997 is true," Conacher said.
"Lobbyists working on campaigns are in violation of the
lobbyists code of conduct very likely in most situations."
The justice department wants Nelson to deal with the complaints, but
Democracy Watch is opposed, saying that his office is structurally
biased because it is part of the Industry department and not
Conacher said he would prefer a provincial ethics commissioner deal
with the eight complaints.
Leaders Debate Jumps the Shark
are in and they're not good.
The English-language debate received 1.4
million viewers down from 2.1 million in 2004. And the
French-language debate was even worse with 671,000 viewers down from
Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe wants to change the debate
format and he could be right.
Perhaps the Paul, Stephen, Jack and Gilles Show has jumped the
If the party leaders were a network sitcom, then they would have to
pull out an old trick, like bringing in a cute toddler -- ala little
Olivia who magically appeared on the Cosby show when Rudy started
growing up -- to help revive their ratings and keep their show on
the air for a few more years
The next TV Guide listing for the leaders debate could read
something like this:
8:00 PM Party Leaders Debate: The Next Generation: "An
orphaned four-year-old arrives at the leaders' debate and soon has everything turned upside-down. She's adorable, impish, and can very nearly out-mug
Jack. She and the four party leaders soon develop a special bond --
in both official languages. She is particularly adept at exhausting
the debate's moderator played by special guest star Avril Lavigne."
© PoliticsWatch® 2005. All rights reserved. Republication
or redistribution of PoliticsWatch content, including by framing,
copying, linking or similar means, is expressly prohibited without
the prior written consent of Public Interests Research and Communications
Inc. (PIRCINC). PoliticsWatch is registered trademark of PIRCINC.