Canada's mixed message on drug
Politics Watch ® News Services
October 24 2007, updated 4:50 p.m.
|Transport Minister Lawrence Cannon.
OTTAWA (PoliticsWatch.com) —
Calls from the president of B.C. Ferries is putting pressure on
the federal government to clarify its position on the complex issue
of mandatory drug testing.
David Hahn, president and CEO of B.C. Ferries,
has been publicly calling for the federal government introduce
legislation to allow for the mandatory drug testing of his
employees. Hahn began his campaign after a Transportation Safety
Board investigation into the sinking of a B.C. ferry discovered
regular marijuana use by crew members.
Hahn has also complained about the RCMP's refusal to conduct
intoxication tests on the crew after the incident.
Transport Minister Lawrence Cannon told the media on the
weekend that companies such as B.C. Ferries already have the power
to test their employees.
What the government is not making clear, however, is whether
companies can take disciplinary action against its employees who
fail drug tests without facing some form of legal challenge.
Karen Izzard, a senior policy advisor to the Canadian
Human Rights Commission (CHRC) told PoliticsWatch that employers
are allowed to institute drug testing of their employees.
"However, those employees if they test positive and are disciplined or fired because of it could potentially file a human rights
complaint," Izzard noted.
"Under the Canadian Human Rights Act, the definition of disability includes previous or current dependence on alcohol and drugs, so a person whose an alcoholic or drug dependent is considered disabled and protected from discriminatory actions because of that."
The situation puts the current Conservative government in an awkward
position just weeks after it introduced a $64 million comprehensive
anti-drug strategy aimed at the general public.
The government's anti-drug strategy includes an awareness campaign
designed to educate Canadian youth and parents about the dangers and
illegality of drugs.
While the government plans to introduce legislation in this session
of Parliament to get tough with drug dealers, Cannon has ruled out
introducing legislation to help companies like B.C. Ferries better
deal with drug users who work in safety-sensitive positions that
could put the public in danger.
After Wednesday's Conservative caucus meeting, PoliticsWatch asked
Cannon if he saw a problem with companies facing the threat of a
human rights complaint if they disciplined employees in safety
sensitive positions for failing drug tests.
"There's jurisprudence there," Cannon said. "There's precedence. That's why that has to be done that way."
The Prime Minister's Office did not respond to an email
asking if it supported the mandatory drug testing of employees in
safety-sensitive positions. Transport Canada referred the same
question to the Treasury Board.
"The responsibility for drug testing is the prerogative of corporate Canada, according to this Canadian Human Rights
policy," a Transport Canada official told PoliticsWatch. "While
thousands of companies in Canada have policies in place they are subject to challenges under the Human Rights Act."
Earlier this year, Treasury Board told PoliticsWatch that the
federal government does not test its employees in the core public
service because case law and the Canadian Human Rights Act
views drug and alcohol testing policies as generally
The CHRC's interpretation of drug dependence being a disability is supported by the office of Prime Minister
"We respect the laws of the land and the decisions of the tribunals,"
Sandra Buckler, Harper's director of communications, told PoliticsWatch in an
email earlier this year.
The CHRC told PoliticsWatch that they encourage employers
contemplating drug and alcohol testing to seek legal advice
beforehand because of the human rights implications of what happens
after a test result.
"The important point from our perspective is if somebody tests positive they be
accommodated, and by that I mean that they're assessed to determine whether they are in fact drug and alcohol dependent and they get treatment for their
disease," Izzard said.
"While discipline may be appropriate in certain circumstances, still the employer needs to bear in mind they do have a duty to
accommodate those individuals who are drug and alcohol dependent."
While people who have drug and alcohol dependency problems are
protected under human rights legislation, Izzard said the protection
of "casual or recreational" users is not clear and is
still before the courts.
"This is really a grey area at this time," she said.
© Politics Watch News Services 2007. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Politics Watch content, including by framing, copying, linking or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Public Interests Research and Communications Inc (PIRCINC). Fees and charges may be applicable for the copying and or redistribution of Politics Watch content. Politics
Watch ® is registered trademark of PIRCINC.